Gegli news - The Russian-Ukrainian maritime conflict includes a point of view on the 1994 agreement

Gegli news - The Russian-Ukrainian maritime conflict includes a point of view on the 1994 agreement - 11/30/2018 1:06:00 AM 1:06:00 AM 

Washington would pay half a billion dollars to Ukraine to transfer 5,000 nuclear weapons to Russia to be abandoned after the deal.

 Twenty-five years ago, Ukraine was the third largest nuclear weapon in the world, with more warheads than Britain, France and China.

The government inherited this arsenal in Kiev after the collapse of the Soviet Union, exposing itself to about 5,000 nuclear weapons, more than 170 intercontinental ballistic missiles and several nuclear bombers.

In 1994, Ukraine agreed to destroy the warehouse against Russia's promise of the country that was not attacked.

But after the Russian forces burned their naval ships on Sunday and killed three of them, Kiev referred to the deal and stated that the United States and Europe should be more concerned with protecting it. In front of the Great Russian Army.

For months, Ukraine has been forced to restrict access to its ports near the Azov Sea and claims that the Kremlin wants to turn it into a Russian lake.

But attacking the ships and arresting their crews brought the relationship between the neighbors to the lowest level. Ukraine says the incident occurred in international waters.

Ukraine insists that Moscow again surrounds the sea, something Moscow denies. Russia says it merely needs to protect all ships as a security measure to inspect a $ 3.6 billion bridge across the Kerch port of its mainland to Crimea, which it set up in 2014.

This is against the background of Ukraine from the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, which was signed in 1994 by Ukraine, Russia, U.S. And U.K.

"Ukraine lost its third nuclear weapon," said Stanislav Babirin, a lawyer and human rights activist in Ukraine, this week, UkrLifeTV. "Today, Russia has violated Ukraine's territorial integrity and is actually launching a Third World War."

After independence in 1991, Ukraine found itself with thousands of Soviet nuclear weapons still controlled by Russian systems.

The United States was deeply concerned about the emergence of another nuclear power potential with ICBMs designed to target the United States and its allies. Washington will agree on an agreement and pay Ukraine half a billion dollars to bring these weapons to Russia.

Instead, Russia, the United States and South Korea agreed to "refrain from threats or use of force against Ukraine" and "respect for the independence and sovereignty and existing borders". Belarus and Kazakhstan also expanded their smaller reserves to similar promises.

When Russia signed the Crimea in 2014, it was widely accepted that the agreement was violated. Ukraine has used this memo as an organized gathering after colliding this week in the Black Sea.

"We attract all the pro-Ukrainian Alliance coalition - we have to join our efforts," said Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko on Monday. "We have been paying attention to our partners at the Budapest Memorandum, which is responsible for protecting sovereignty and territorial integrity."

The explanation of Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2014 was that the memorandum was agreed with a previous government of Ukraine, so it was no longer valid. Most observers rejected it as ridiculous. If the agreements with the governments that signed them were expired, important treaties would be denied throughout history.

In 2016, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also explained that the agreement does not merely make its signatories "do not use nuclear weapons against Ukraine" - which is not true.

However, some have expressed concern that Poroshenko could use the Azov crisis to undermine democracy, as he is hard at pre-election elections held in March.

He also reminded Budapest memoirs of the war law, which did not even happen at the peak of the country's crisis in 2014.

The tool includes boats from sanctions against Russia from the EU and the EU since the Crimean isolation.

"There is no way to make this a limited war like Falklands," said Watling, referring to the British war with Argentina in 1982. This is the third world war and the danger of increasing weapons is unacceptable. We are not ready for this Crimean danger. "